USPTO serial 78268756
LILY OF FRANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LILY OF FRANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Bowling Green, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen L. Winslow, Esq.
T. Leslie Dooley Vanity Fair, Inc.One Fruit of the Loom DriveBowling Green, KY 42103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, slippers, canvas footwear, beach footwear. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |