USPTO serial 78268991
POOL ANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3182456Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POOL ANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VAUXBUIN, FR
VAUXBUIN, FR
VAUXBUIN, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maurice B. Pilosof
MAURICE B PILOSOF MAURICE B PILOSOF ESQPO BOX 691937WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Swimming pool sweepers and swimming pool pumps; mechanical reel apparatus for reeling in flexible pool hoses; electric motors for machines; electric motors for pool pumps and automatic pool vacuums; pool pump accessories, namely pump diaphragms and steam traps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | plastic flexible tubes, pipe muffs and pipe junctions for use in cleaning pools | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |