USPTO serial 78269206
RESISTANCE WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RESISTANCE WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Wesorick
RICHARD S WESORICK TAROLLI, SUNDHEIM, COVELL & TUMMINO LLPSTE 1111 526 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Exercise apparel, namely hats, shirts, jackets, vests, sweatpants, sweatshirts, shorts, sports bras, socks | ABANDONED | Jan 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |