Drawing for A.C.E.

USPTO serial 78269355

A.C.E.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A.C.E.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

NORM J RICH FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 5003000 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042providing information in the fields of molecular biology research, biopharmaceuticals, drug development, and medical and scientific research applications, and not in the area of health and fitnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 22, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 10, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 22, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 22, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 12, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 7, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance