Drawing for MISS LIBERTY

USPTO serial 78269389

MISS LIBERTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISS LIBERTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Dairy-based beverages, dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips, applesauce, cranberry sauce, fruit topping, jams, jellies, marmalade, snack dips excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips, dairy and non-dairy based whipped topping, yogurt-based beveragesACTIVE—
030Barbecue sauce, bases for making milkshakes, bonbons, chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies, crackers, custards, custard-based fillings for cakes and pies, dessert souffles, espresso, extracts used as flavorings not essential oils, flavored and sweetened gelatins, flavored ices, flavoring, sweetened gelatin desserts, flavoring additives for non-nutritional purposes, flavoring syrup, freezable liquid for use in making frozen confections, frozen confections, fruit ice, honey, ice, ice cream drinks, marinades, milk shakes, pancake syrup, pretzels, puddings, salsa, sherbet, table syrup, topping syrupACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 3, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2006UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Feb 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2005GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 19, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 19, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance