USPTO serial 78269391
NIBBLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIBBLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fayetteville, AR
Fayetteville, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ
S. Christian Gunn Keisling Pieper & Scott, PLC3739 Steele Blvd., Suite340Fayetteville, AR 72703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen prepared meals consisting of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; frozen hors d'ouvres, appetizers and/or canapés, namely, stuffed and marinated mushrooms | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen prepared meals consisting of pasta or rice; frozen sandwiches; frozen desserts, namely, crepes napoleon, tarts and cream puffs; and frozen hors d'ourves, appetizers and/or canapés, namely, crostinis, stuffed phyllo shells and crepes napoleon | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |