Drawing for WATER

USPTO serial 78269398

WATER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan G. O'Neill

SUSAN G. O'NEILL HANSON BRIDGETT LLP425 MARKET STREET, 26TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007dishwashers and clothes washersACTIVE—
009electronic irrigation controllers and weather-based irrigation controllers; automatic and electronic rain sensors; electronic moisture sensors, namely, sensors used to measure moisture and depletion of moisture in plant root, zone and soil; automatic valves, control valves for regulating the flow of gases and liquids, electronic valves for controlling gas or fluids, pressure relief valves for controlling flow of fluids, solenoid valves, and sprinkler valve wiring hubs, including both computerized and non-computerized units.ACTIVE—
010x-ray machines for medical usesACTIVE—
011ice-making machines; flush valves to clean irrigating systems; pressure regulating irrigation control valves for landscape irrigation; autoclaves; steam sterilizers not intended for medical use; plumbing and sanitation fixtures, namely, faucets, shower heads, toilets and urinals; electric food steamers for use in food service applications; dripper irrigation systems comprised of valves, filters, and regulators; lawn sprinkler systems comprising pumps, valves, and filters; manually operated plumbing valves; plumbing fittings, namely bibbs, cocks, traps, and valves; valves being part of sprinkler systems; and pressure regulating valves connected to a water supplyACTIVE—
021shut-off and water efficient hose nozzles; plastic pre-rinse spray nozzles for dish washing and rinsing; irrigation spray heads for delivering a uniform application of water to specific planting areas; irrigation spray heads with pressure regulating devices to reduce pressure for individual irrigation circuits, zones or stations; irrigation spray heads with check valvesACTIVE—
035distributorship and retail store services featuring water conservation and water use efficiency products; association services, namely, promoting public awareness of the need to conserve water; conducting marketing studies in the field of water efficiency and water conservation; conducting tradeshows in the field of water efficiency and water conservationACTIVE—
039public utility servicesACTIVE—
041publication services, namely publication of journals, publication of brochures, publication of leaflets, publication of manuals, publication of printed matter, and online publication of journals, brochures, leaflets, and manuals; educational services, namely conducting training courses, workshops and seminars in the field of water efficiency and water conservationACTIVE—
042counseling customers and members of the general public on water conservation benefits and methods; testing and evaluation for third parties of plumbing fixtures, appliances, irrigation equipment, and cooling processes and other commercial water-using equipment to determine compliance with established standards of water efficiencyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Oct 6, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 7, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 7, 2010EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Mar 11, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 9, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 31, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 5, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 5, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 11, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 25, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 23, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 4, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Oct 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 31, 2006AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2006ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 2006MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 17, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2006ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 27, 2005MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2005CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 23, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance