USPTO serial 78269454
HEALING PAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALING PAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne M. Sterba
ANNE M STERBA ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | NUTRICEUTICAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR PERIOPERATIVE, PERIPROCEDURE, PERIDENTAL AND POST FRACTURE USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| May 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |