Drawing for MAX PROFIT SELLING

USPTO serial 78269464

MAX PROFIT SELLING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAX PROFIT SELLING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George C. Chen

GEORGE C CHEN BRYAN CAVE LLPSTE 2200TWO N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004-4406

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting seminars in the field of sales and selling and distributing course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 7, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 8, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance