USPTO serial 78270774
BAKER HUGHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAKER HUGHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Albert Riddle
J ALBERT RIDDLE BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED3900 ESSEX LN STE 1200HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Oilfield and specialty chemicals and chemical compositions; namely, additives for use in the drilling, completion and workover of oil and gas wells, corrosion inhibitors, enhancers for petrochemical plan processes, drag reducers and wax solvents | ACTIVE | Sep 10, 1998 |
| 007 | Oil, gas, water, and sulfur well tools and equipment; namely, whipstocks, packers, baffle plates, bailers, ball releasing tools, bottom hole scrapers, bridge plug setting tools, bridge plugs, casing centralizers, casing collars, casing guides, casing mills, casing scrapers, casing shoes, cementing baskets, cementing manifolds, cementing plugs, change-over flow tubes, circulating subs, circulation joints, cleanout bailers, controllers, downhole fishing and milling tools, downhole motors, directional drilling tools, downhole oil/water separators, downhole production pumps and drill bits, drill pipe floats, electric submersible motors, electric submersible pumps, electric submersible seals, electrical submersible pump cables, expansion joints, feelers and junk catchers, fishing tools, hook-up nipples, horizontal pumps, hydraulic hand pumps, junk baskets, junk pushers, kelly and pipe straighteners, liner hangers, measurement while drilling and logging while drilling tools, packer setting tools, packers, perforation and completion tools and pipe vises and parts thereof; plug catchers, plug dropping heads, retrievable cementers, retrieving joints, rotary gas separators, safety joints, sand screens, stop rings, tubing anchors, tubing centralizers, tubing heads, tubing seal nipples, tubing shoes, tubing swivels, unloading joints, valves, variable speed controllers, wall scrapers, wall scratchers, well packers, wire line jars, wire line setting and operating tools, wireline logging and formation sampling tools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |