USPTO serial 78271067
DELMONICO'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DELMONICO'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Purcell
Robert E. Purcell Hiscock & Barclay, LLPOne Park Place300 South State StreetSyracuse, NY 13202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services | ABANDONED | Dec 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |