USPTO serial 78271419
DUCKFEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUCKFEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen M. Walsh
KRISTEN M. WALSH NIXON PEABODY LLP1300 CLINTON SQUAREROCHESTER, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Massage oil; shampoo; lotion, namely, hand lotion, foot lotion, and body lotion; lip balm, cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated diaper rash cream; sun care lotion; body wash; bar soaps; and oils, namely, baby oil, body oil, bath oil, and essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNSI | SU - SUSPENSION INQUIRY - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |