CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PAIZA

USPTO serial 78272397

PAIZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAIZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Okin Goldsmith

Susan Okin Goldsmith Duane Morris LLP744 Broad StreetSuite 1200Newark, NJ 07102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043providing facilities for conventions; providing banquet and social function facilities for fund raising and special eventsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 10, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 8, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 10, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 8, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 8, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 29, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance