USPTO serial 78273491
CINEBANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CINEBANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID MALAMED
OLIVIER DELOUIS SYSTEM PARTNERS INC156 W 56TH ST STE 2003NEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computerized, robotic, vending or renting machines for dispensing entertainment products, namely, digital video disks, compacts disks, video tape cassettes and other multimedia formats, operated by introducing a coin, bill, token, or card, in particular a magnetic card, a magnetically coded card or any other type of card | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | retail store services featuring entertainment products, namely, digital video disks, compacts disks, video tape cassettes and other multimedia formats, and entertainment and automatic machines that dispense entertainment products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | rental of entertainment products, namely, digital video disks, compacts disks, video tape cassettes and other multimedia formats, and entertainment and automatic machines that dispense entertainment products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SYSTEM PARTNERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SYSTEM PARTNERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by de Laforcade, Stephane
- Other trademarks owned by Delouis, Olivier
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named CINEBANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |