USPTO serial 78273679
Serial No. 78273679
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78273679?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter Katz, Esq.
PETER KATZ ESQ DAY, BERRY & HOWARD LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Encoded magnetic stripe cards and encoded smart cards containing unique identifiers and attributes associated with specific consumers or assigned users to authorize processing of commercial transactions to provide identification, authenticate individuals, match consumers to a profile containing preferences for services, payment and rewards programs, and authorize processing or payment and identification transactions; digital card readers; application software that enables such cards to be used for the purposes of customer identification and recording customer preferences and enabling remote electronic payment and commercial transactions in the fields of sports venues, entertainment, and restaurants; an electronic transponder containing information in the nature of a unique radio frequency identification code used to authorize processing of commercial transactions, provide identification, authenticate individuals, match customers to a profile containing preferences for services, payment and rewards programs, and authorize processing of payment and identification transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | KEY CHAINS AND KEY FOBS, NOT OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing to client businesses an internet web site on which consumer purchase and preference data is aggregated, enabling businesses to formulate and execute loyalty rewards and preferred customers programs; business marketing consulting services for others; conducting marketing studies for others; business services, namely enabling transaction authorization by merchants and integrated tracking and management of commercial transactions via radio frequency communication with an encoded chip-card token; operating an on-line marketplace on which businesses who formulate and execute loyalty rewards and preferred costumer programs can allow customers to access and apply loyalty rewards | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Verification of identification, namely, unique customer number verification in the nature of providing user authentication services in consumer purchase, attendance or admittance transactions; collection and collation of information, namely, customer authentication services in consumer purchase, attendance or admittance transactions using radio frequency communications with an encoded chip-card token to evaluate, analyze and collect service data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART System Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART System Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |