USPTO serial 78273837
THE ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3021733Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Atascadero, CA
ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT, LLC, THE
Atascadero, CA
ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT, LLC, THE
Atascadero, CA
ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT, LLC, THE
Atascadero, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shauna Cunningham
Shauna Cunningham Carmel & Naccasha LLP1410 Marsh StreetSan Luis Obispo, CA 93401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Baby shampoo, baby hair conditioner, baby body soap and wash, baby body/skin lotion and creams, baby hair styling gel, baby hair styling balm, baby sunscreen, baby hair detangler, baby oils, shampoo, hair conditioner, body soap and wash, body/skin lotion and creams, hair styling gel, hair styling balm | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 27, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Inga Tritt
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT, LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT, LLC, THE
- Other trademarks owned by ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT, LLC, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named THE ORIGINAL LITTLE SPROUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |