USPTO serial 78273884
GEN 2 MIL-DOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEN 2 MIL-DOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley P. Fisher
JUAN CARLOS A. MARQUEZ REED SMITH LLP3110 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVESUITE 1400FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Rifle and pistol scope reticles | ABANDONED | Jan 9, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |