Drawing for INTERNET TALKER

USPTO serial 78273941

INTERNET TALKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2953865Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 17, 2005
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INTERNET TALKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jon L. Roberts

JON L ROBERTS ROBERTS ABOKHAIR & MARDULA, LLCSTE 100011800 SUNRISE VLY DRRESTON, VA 20191

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications devices, namely, IP network access devices in the nature of micro-gateway apparatus that convert voice signals into data packets, format the data packets for transmission over an IP network, receive data packets from an IP network and convert the data packets into voice signals, used in conjunction with a service provider network to establish voice communications with at least two parties wherein at least a portion of the communication is transported over an IP networkSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 2, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 6, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 10, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2005CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 15, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance