USPTO serial 78274074
LBJ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LBJ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beaverton, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth M. Kwartler, Esq.
KENNETH M KWARTLER ESQ NIKE1 SW BOWERMAN DRBEAVERTON, OR 97005-0979UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear and apparel, namely, shirts, pants, shorts, caps, hats, headbands, tank tops, t-shirts; pullovers, sweatshirts, sweaters, vests, warm-up suits, gloves, socks, underwear, wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 10, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |