USPTO serial 78274177
TROY'S BUCKET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 26, 2005
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TROY'S BUCKET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Tucson, AZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment namely, live performances by a musical band | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Tim
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Tim
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Tim
- Other trademarks owned by Carpenter, Bryon, C
- Other trademarks owned by Carpenter, Bryon, C
- Other trademarks owned by McElhaney, Tom
- Other trademarks owned by Schmidt, Mike, L
- Other trademarks owned by Schmidt, Mike, L
- Other trademarks owned by Carpenter, Bryon, C
- Other trademarks owned by Schmidt, Mike, L
- Other trademarks owned by Sevenski, Russel
- Other trademarks owned by Sevenski, Russel
- Other trademarks owned by Sevenski, Russel
- Other trademarks owned by Lesure, James, S
- Other trademarks owned by Lesure, James, S
- Other trademarks owned by McElhaney, Tom
- Other trademarks owned by McElhaney, Tom
- Other trademarks owned by Lesure, James, S
- Other trademarks owned by Magariel, Cullen
- Other trademarks owned by Magariel, Cullen
- Other trademarks owned by Magariel, Cullen
- Other trademarks owned by Tierney, Mike
- Other trademarks owned by Tierney, Mike
- Other trademarks owned by Tierney, Mike
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TROY'S BUCKET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |