Drawing for BEARS BEST

USPTO serial 78274484

BEARS BEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEARS BEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David C. West

DAVID C. WEST FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 S. 6TH STREET, SUITE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools, namely, drills, drill presses, sanders, grinders, engravers, polishers, shears, sprayers, rivet guns and riveters, ratchets, wrenches, buffers, scrapers, screwdrivers, punch and flange tools, saws, reciprocating saws, circular saws, table saws, nailers, hammers, shanks, grinders, file tools, abrasive and grinding wheels, jointers and planers, lathes, routers, trimmers, cutters, welding machines, threaders for pipes and bolts, and parts thereforeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 22, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 30, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 10, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 22, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance