Drawing for TRIPLE CANOPY

USPTO serial 78274548

TRIPLE CANOPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIPLE CANOPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph T. Nabor

JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE AND MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT, FEATURING INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY SCIENCE AND SECURITY SERVICES AND DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF TEXTBOOKS, MANUALS, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS, TEACHING MATERIALS, BROCHURES, LEAFLETS AND INFORMATIONAL FLIERS ALL IN THE FIELD OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY SCIENCE AND SECURITY SERVICES AND ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, TEXTBOOKS, MANUALS, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS, TEACHING MATERIALS, BROCHURES, LEAFLETS AND INFORMATIONAL FLIERS FEATURING LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY SCIENCE AND SECURITY SERVICES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIAACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, TEXTBOOKS, MANUALS, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS, TEACHING MATERIALS, BROCHURES, LEAFLETS, INFORMATIONAL FLIERS, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY SCIENCE AND SECURITY SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 30, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance