USPTO serial 78275067
GREAT FOOD EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3003034Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 27, 2005
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREAT FOOD EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Rambo
WILLIAM RAMBO WM. CATES RAMBO, ATTORNEYS414 WALNUT ST STE 508CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3913UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Shelf-stable food entrees, side items, sauces, stews and chili consisting primarily of meat and vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2004 |
| 030 | Shelf-stable food entrees, side items, sauces, stews and chili consisting primarily of rice or potatoes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2004 |
| 043 | Preparing shelf-stable food entrees, side items, sauces, stews and chili consisting primarily of meat and vegetables to the specifications of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE WORNICK COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by THE WORNICK COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Wornick Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named GREAT FOOD EXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |