USPTO serial 78275183
LEGAL GROUNDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with LEGAL GROUNDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen M. Mondry
Karen M. Mondry MONDRY & MONDRY, ATTORNEYS AT LAW55 W. Goethe #1218n/aChicago, IL 60610Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | coffee, tea, sandwiches, pastries | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondry, Karen M.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondry, Karen M.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondry, Karen M.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondry, Steven M.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondry, Steven M.
- Other trademarks owned by Mondry, Steven M.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named LEGAL GROUNDS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |