USPTO serial 78275213
LASER APP SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2904918Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 23, 2004
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LASER APP SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Upland, CA, US
EXTON, PA, US
Ontario, CA, US
ONTARIO, CA, US
Upland, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm J. Rich
Norm J. Rich Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, computer software for use in accessing a library of computer generated forms that are automatically populated by database | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Laser App Software
- Other trademarks owned by IPIPELINE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Laser App Software
- Other trademarks owned by LASER APP SOFTWARE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Laser App Software
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named LASER APP SOFTWARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 23, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 28, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 27, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 22, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 30, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |