Drawing for IMPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 78275319

IMPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia Johnson Walden, Amy L. Brosius, Timothy A. French, Frederick H. Rabin, Debra S. Serota, Nicole E. Gage, John T. Williams, Patricia Nelson, and Mark A. Fischer

CYNTHIA JOHNSON WALDEN, AMY L BROSIUS FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrically operated kitchen utensils, namely, mixers, shredders, food slicers, knives, milling and mincing machines, meat mincers, kneading machines, blenders, grating machines, juice extractors, juicers, citrus pressers, can openers, coffee grinders, flour mills, kitchen knife grinders, and parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
011Electrical appliances for the preparation of brewed beverages, namely, cappuccino and espresso machines; electric grilling apparatus, namely, electric grills, and parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—
021Containers for kitchen and household use, namely, strainers for coffeeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 30, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 7, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance