USPTO serial 78275348
KALIMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3172007Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 14, 2006
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KALIMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORONA DEL MAR, CA
CORONA DEL MAR, CA
Corona del Mar, CA
Corona del Mar, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FARAH P BHATTI
FARAH P BHATTI MCDERMONT WILL & EMERY LLP18191 VON KARMAN AVE STE 400IRVINE, CA 92612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | DAIRY BASED, FLAVORED BREWED MALT BEVERAGES IN THE NATURE OF BEER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 27, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JP BEVERAGES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by JP BEVERAGES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Valdez, Steven, Troy
- Other trademarks owned by Valdez, Steven, Troy
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named KALIMA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |