Drawing for EVERTUFF

USPTO serial 78275402

EVERTUFF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERTUFF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen K. Hammond

DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008LAWN AND GARDEN TOOLS, NAMELY, GARDEN TROWELS, CULTIVATORS, LAWN EDGERS, LAWN WEEDERS, SOD LIFTERS, WEED CUTTERS, GRASS TRIMMERS, BULB PLANTERS; STRIKING TOOLS, NAMELY, MATTOCKS, PICKS, WOOD-SPLITTING WEDGES, MAULS, HEAVY HAMMERS, SLEDGE HAMMERS, DIGGING AND PRYING BARS; PRUNING TOOLS, NAMELY, VEGETATION KNIVES AND SHEARS, PRUNING SAWS; HAND-OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY, SHOVELS, SPADES, RAKES, HOES, SCOOPS, POSTHOLE DIGGERS, SCRAPERS, SNOW SHOVELS AND SNOW PUSHERSACTIVE—
012WHEELBARROWS, HAND TRUCKS AND YARD CARTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 8, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 25, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 18, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 3, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 24, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 22, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 19, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance