Drawing for BDM

USPTO serial 78275551

BDM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BDM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PENNY R. SLICER, REG. NO. 34,017

PENNY R SLICER STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORSTINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP1201 WALNUT STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64106-2150

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008POCKETKNIVESACTIVE—
009ANALOG TACHOMETERS AND COMPUTER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, MOUSE PADSACTIVE—
012MOTORCYCLES AND MOTORCYCLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY ENGINES, PERFORMANCE AND ELECTRONIC PACKAGES, NAMELY, TRAILERS, ALARMS, SAFETY HARNESSES, CUP HOLDERS, DRINK HOLDERS, COVERS, GAS CAPS, STANDS, BUMPERS, FENDERS, TRIM BADGES, FRAMES, WHEELS, FORKS, RACKS, LEVERS, SIDECARS, WINDSHIELDS, FAIRINGS, BRAKE CALIPERS, BRAKE ROTORSACTIVE—
014WATCHES, CLOCKS; LIGHTERS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL; ORNAMENTAL PINSACTIVE—
016PAPER ITEMS, NAMELY, POSTERS AND SIGNS; STICKERS AND BUSINESS CARD HOLDERSACTIVE—
020FURNITURE, NAMELY, BAR STOOLS; PLASTIC KEY CHAINSACTIVE—
021SOUVENIR, NOVELTY AND COLLECTIBLE ITEMS, NAMELY, SHOT GLASSES, DRINKING GLASSES, MUGS, BEVERAGE COOLERS, NAMELY, KOOZIES; PLASTIC LICENSE PLATESACTIVE—
025BANDANASACTIVE—
026CLOTH PATCHES FOR CLOTHINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 22, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 3, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 5, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance