Drawing for I-COMMAND

USPTO serial 78275613

I-COMMAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-COMMAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda A. Kuczma

LINDA A KUCZMA WALLENSTEIN & WAGNER LTD311 S WACKER DR FL 53CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus, namely receivers, digital audio players and recorders, DVD players and recorders, CD players and recorders, satellite receivers, cable boxes, televisions, video projectors, cassette players and recorders, video players and recorders, tuners, amplifiers and loudspeakers for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; remote control apparatus, namely, personal digital assistants, tablet PCs, in-wall keypad controllers, touch-screen panel controllers, signal transmitter/receiver nodes, network nodes, network hubs, network interfaces and computer software used for controlling receivers, digital audio players and recorders, DVD players and recorders, CD players and recorders, satellite receivers, cable boxes, televisions, video projectors, cassette players and recorders, video players and recorders, tuners, amplifiers, loudspeakers, lighting and motorized drapes; radio frequency transmitters and receiversACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 20, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 12, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 5, 2005ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jul 7, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 20, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance