USPTO serial 78275821
TINY TEKKIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNYDER, NELSON B
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TINY TEKKIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Tiny Tekkies, Inc; is a company that provides state of the art childcare services and educational instruction to children 6 weeks to 13 years of age utlizing the latest advances in technology;; Tiny Tekkies, Inc; is a company that provides state of the art childcare services and educational instruction to children 6 weeks to 13 years of age utlizing the latest advances in technology | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |