Drawing for YOU'RE LOOKIN AT ONE HAPPY GRANDPAPPY

USPTO serial 78276254

YOU'RE LOOKIN AT ONE HAPPY GRANDPAPPY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOU'RE LOOKIN AT ONE HAPPY GRANDPAPPY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Powelson

F DAVID LARIVIERE LARIVIERE, GRUBMAN & PAYNE, LLPPO BOX 314019 UPPER RAGSDALE DR STE 200MONTEREY, CA 93942

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets; and headgear, namely, hats, visors, and capsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance