Drawing for INTOKO

USPTO serial 78276347

INTOKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTOKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret C. McHugh

Margaret C. McHugh Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, 8th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agencies; business management; administration of business payroll for others; distribution of advertising for third parties via an on-line electronic communication network; database managementACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics by means of telephone, cable, and satellite transmissions; providing Internet accessACTIVE—
042Web site design, development and management for others; computer services, namely data recovery services, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks, redirecting electronic mail to changed personal electronic address, filtering of unwanted e-mails; mediation services in the fields of advertising, relating to business sales and purchases of goods and services, and with respect to the development and closing of business contactsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 2, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 1, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 3, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance