USPTO serial 78276385
ENERGIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2918906Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ENERGIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shell Trademark Management B.V.
The Hague, NL
Shell Trademark Management B.V.
The Hague, NL
Shell Trademark Management B.V.
The Hague, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimbley L. Muller
KIMBLEY L MULLER SHELL OIL COMPANY910 LOUISIANA OSP 4794HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Energy management services, namely, monitoring, analysing, and optimising the energy management and energy efficiency of industrial processes; advisory and consultancy services in respect of the aforementioned services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, classes, seminars, workshops, and conferences and training services for optimising the energy management and energy efficiency of industrial processes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and implementation for others of technological measures, namely, computer hardware and computer software systems for optimising the energy management and energy efficiency of industrial processes; advisory and consultancy services in respect of the aforementioned services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shell Trademark Management B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Shell Trademark Management B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Shell Trademark Management B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENERGIZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |