USPTO serial 78276605
INTRAMED SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTRAMED SCIENTIFIC SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING GRANTS TO ACCREDITED CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION ORGANIZATIONS AND INSTITUTIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | MEDICAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING CONTINUING EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCES, SEMINARS AND OTHER EVENTS FOR PHYSICIANS AND HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS, AND COURSE MATERIAL DISTRIBUTED THEREWITH; CONDUCTING INDEPENDENT OR ACCREDITED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING FUNDED THROUGH EDUCATIONAL GRANTS IN THE FIELDS OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACEUTICALS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |