USPTO serial 78276662
GIOVANNA'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- BUNCH, TASHIA AUNGELIK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GIOVANNA'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Plainfield, NJ, US
Plainfield, NJ, US
Plainfield, NJ, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Marinated onions | ACTIVE | Sep 11, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 5, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Dec 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GSPS | NOTIFICATION OF SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GSPR | SU - PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | SPRA | SU - PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |