Drawing for TECHTALK

USPTO serial 78277334

TECHTALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHTALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas W. Lindberg, Scott T. Piering, Ronald E. Hunter

THOMAS W LINDBERG, SCOTT T PIERING, RO CARGILL, INCORPORATEDLAW DEPT MS24PO BOX 5624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newsletters regarding laboratory and research services and sales in the field of food ingredients, health and nutritionACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Dec 28, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jun 28, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jun 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 27, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 29, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 17, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 29, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 10, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance