USPTO serial 78277336
POKER21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POKER21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doran J. Ingalls
DORAN J INGALLS FASKEN MARTINEAU DUMOULIN LLP2100 - 1075 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6E 3G2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | currency and credit operated slot machines and gaming devices, namely, gaming machines for use in gaming establishments; computer operating systems through local and global communication networks for on-line games of chance, sweepstakes and wagering and computer operating systems for providing gaming establishments with operational cash and gaming chip controls | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | board games, electronic board games, playing cards and casino gaming equipment namely,gaming tables, gaming and poker chips and casino gaming table felts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, providing online games of chance, sweepstakes and wagering via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |