USPTO serial 78277371
MIRRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 4, 2009
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MIRRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cupertino, CA
Mountain View, CA
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ian L. Saffer
Ian L. Saffer ADSERO IP8210 Southpark TerraceLittleton, CO 80120UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer peripherals; communications servers; network access server hardware; network access server operating software; computer hardware and software for managing and storing data, information, and digital and multimedia content for personal and business related purposes; computer hardware and software for the synchronization of files, data, information, digital and multimedia content; computer hardware and software for backup, local and remote sharing of files, data, digital and multimedia content, and for providing remote access to data, information, digital and multimedia content stored on computer hardware and software; and user manuals supplied therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seagate Technology LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ispiri, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MIRRA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MIRRA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MIRRA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MIRRA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | C.7F | REQUEST FOR NEW CERTIFICATE FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |