USPTO serial 78277579
THE FARRIER'S WIFE HOOF CONDITION DOES NOT CONTAIN ALCOHOL OR IODINE CONTAIN VITAMIN A & VITAMIN E16 FL. OZ./473 ML.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE FARRIER'S WIFE HOOF CONDITION DOES NOT CONTAIN ALCOHOL OR IODINE CONTAIN VITAMIN A & VITAMIN E16 FL. OZ./473 ML.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thousand Oaks, CA
Thousand Oaks, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Non-Medical Animal Care Products | ACTIVE | Aug 15, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jeanne E. Raede
- Other trademarks owned by John W. Raede
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named THE FARRIER'S WIFE HOOF CONDITION DOES NOT CONTAIN ALCOHOL OR IODINE CONTAIN VITAMIN A & VITAMIN E16 FL. OZ./473 ML.
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |