USPTO serial 78277643
HOBBIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOBBIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alphen Aan De Rijn, NL
Alphen Aan De Rijn, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR 255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, O, 45202-4728,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely, living flowers; flower seeds; living annual bedding plants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |