USPTO serial 78277681
HOTELS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOTELS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
Kevin G. Smith Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 800Washington, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR OTHERS ABOUT TEMPORARY LODGING; TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY, MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TEMPORARY LODGING FOR OTHERS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE AND THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |