Drawing for DBK

USPTO serial 78277710

DBK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DBK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandre A. Montagu, Esq.

ALEXANDRE A MONTAGU ESQ ALEXANDRE A. MONTAGU PC1060 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10128UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electrical kitchen appliances, namely electric kitchen knives, food processors, mixers, food blenders, juicersACTIVE—
008Kitchen knives, non-electric fruit and vegetable peelersACTIVE—
009Measuring cups and spoons, scales, thermometers not for medical useACTIVE—
011Electric coffee makers, electric tea kettles, electric toastersACTIVE—
016Paper coastersACTIVE—
021Tableware, namely china dishes, napkin rings not of precious metals, plastic coasters, coasters not of paper and not being table linen; cookware, namely pots and pans; kitchen utensils, namely whisks, spatulas, cooking spoons in the nature of basting spoons, mixing spoons, serving spoons, cooking oil sprayers sold empty, cork-screws, graters, strainers, bowls, colandersACTIVE—
024Kitchen textiles, namely towels, oven mitts, pot holders, table cloths, napkins, placemats, fabric table runners, cloth coastersACTIVE—
027Kitchen rugsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance