USPTO serial 78277837
MDAHOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MDAHOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Natalia Utrera
NATALIA UTRERA SPIEGEL & UTRERA PAPO BOX 450605MIAMI, FL 33245UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Data access services, namely, providing a high speed access to area networks and a global computer information network; corporate digital media delivery by electronic transmission; enterprise text and numeric wireless digital messaging services; integrated rich media content delivery of messages by electronic transmission; providing on-line chat rooms for virtual communities for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning business related data and information | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2003 |
| 039 | Storage services, namely, storage of electronic media, namely, images, text and audio data, and providing independent storage consultancy services in connection therewith | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 15, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |