USPTO serial 78277891
HIDE-N-SEEK HAYLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3056211Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 31, 2006
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIDE-N-SEEK HAYLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
Fresno, CA, US
Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
Fresno, CA, US
FRESNO, CA, US
FRESNO, CA, US
FRESNO, CA, US
Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
Fresno, CA, US
FRESNO, CA, US
Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
Fresno, CA, US
Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
Fresno, CA, US
Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
Fresno, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lenden F. Webb
LENDEN F WEBB WEBB & WALTON LLP466 W FALLBROOK , SUITE 102FRESNO, CA 93711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toy and game, namely, electronic, interactive doll | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
- Other trademarks owned by Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
- Other trademarks owned by SHELCIN DESIGNS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SHELCIN DESIGNS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by SHELCIN DESIGNS, INC
- Other trademarks owned by Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
- Other trademarks owned by SHELCIN DESIGNS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
- Other trademarks owned by Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
- Other trademarks owned by Shelly Conte and Cindy Reichman
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named HIDE-N-SEEK HAYLEY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2012 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |