USPTO serial 78278155
ASSET PORTAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3072251Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 21, 2006
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ASSET PORTAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judson K. Champlin
JUDSON K CHAMPLIN WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY900 2ND AVE S STE 1400MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING SECURE ACCESS TO THE VALUE OF, AND STRUCTURAL AND OPERATIONAL INFORMATION AND DATA ABOUT, INDUSTRIAL PLANTS AND PROCESSES, INDUSTRIAL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, PROCESS EQUIPMENT AND INSTRUMENTS AND VALVES FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES, AT LOCAL AND REMOTE LOCATIONS, VIA LOCAL AREA AND GLOBAL NETWORKS; FOR EVALUATING INFORMATION AND DATA RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL PLANTS AND PROCESSES, INDUSTRIAL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, PROCESS EQUIPMENT, AND INSTRUMENTS AND VALVES FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES; AND FOR MAKING DECISIONS AS TO MAINTAINING, SERVICING, OPERATING AND REPLACING SUCH EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS AND VALVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |