Drawing for KOMPTECH FARWICK

USPTO serial 78278287

KOMPTECH FARWICK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3019623Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOMPTECH FARWICK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

THILO C. AGTHE

THILO C. AGTHE BAGG, ROSKE & ASSOCIATES, LLP500 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 4810NEW YORK, NY 10110

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MACHINES FOR THE TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE, NAMELY, WOOD, GARBAGE, REFUSE, TIRE AND RAILWAY TIE SHREDDERS, LOADERS AND MIXER-CRUSHERS; VIBRATORY AND ROTARY SCREENER SEPARATORS; WASTE SEPARATORS, COMPOSTERS; COMPOST TURNERSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 3, 2002
011BIOREACTORS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE; SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS; MACHINES FOR FERMENTATION OF WASTE, NAMELY, FERMENTERS AND POST FERMENTERS; MASH/LIQUID SEPARATORS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODSSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDSep 3, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 9, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2007C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 26, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance