USPTO serial 78278287
KOMPTECH FARWICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3019623Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 29, 2005
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KOMPTECH FARWICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Frohnleiten, AT
FROHNLEITEN, AT
Frohnleiten, AT
Frohnleiten, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THILO C. AGTHE
THILO C. AGTHE BAGG, ROSKE & ASSOCIATES, LLP500 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 4810NEW YORK, NY 10110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MACHINES FOR THE TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE, NAMELY, WOOD, GARBAGE, REFUSE, TIRE AND RAILWAY TIE SHREDDERS, LOADERS AND MIXER-CRUSHERS; VIBRATORY AND ROTARY SCREENER SEPARATORS; WASTE SEPARATORS, COMPOSTERS; COMPOST TURNERS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 2002 |
| 011 | BIOREACTORS FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE; SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS; MACHINES FOR FERMENTATION OF WASTE, NAMELY, FERMENTERS AND POST FERMENTERS; MASH/LIQUID SEPARATORS, AND REPLACEMENT PARTS FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED GOODS | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPTECH FARWICK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPTECH GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPTECH FARWICK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by KOMPTECH FARWICK GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named KOMPTECH FARWICK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |