USPTO serial 78278740
MEXBEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3344975Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEXBEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Mexcio City, MX
Other trademarks owned by Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Mexcio City, MX
Other trademarks owned by Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Mexcio City, MX
Other trademarks owned by Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christianne Edlund
Christianne Edlund Mullin Law, PC2425 N. Central ExpresswaySuite 200Richardson, TX 75080Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | bouillon | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 25, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
- Other trademarks owned by Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
- Other trademarks owned by Bernardo Garduno-Lomelin and Jorge L. Gonzalez
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named MEXBEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |