USPTO serial 78279353
EVOLVASI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOLVASI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts, namely, crewneck t-shirts, polo shirts with collars, button up shirts, and long sleeve shirts; shorts, namely, khaki shorts, jean shorts, sweat shorts, and mesh shorts; pants, namely, blue jeans, khaki pants, dress pants, sweat pants, and wind resistant pants; shoes, namely, running shoes, recreational shoes, skateboarding shoes, and hiking shoes; caps, namely, adjustable caps and one size fits all caps; sweaters, namely, hooded long sleeve sweaters, long sleeve sweaters without hoods, zip up long sleeve sweaters, and button up long sleeve sweaters; jackets, namely, zip up jackets, button up jackets, hooded jackets, jean jackets, wind resistant jackets, sports jackets, and suit jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2025 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2025 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2025 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |