USPTO serial 78279693
MANPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MANPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milwaukee, WI
Milwaukee, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dermot Horgan or Jeannine Haas
Dermot Horgan or Jeannine Haas IPHorgan Ltd.Suite #2401130 Lake Cook RoadBuffalo Grove, IL 60089Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for assessing job, business, contact center, customer service, clerical accounting, basic accounting, word processing, and/or office automation software skills; computer software for use in job, business, word processing, and/or office automation software training | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |